Responsabilidad Social de las Universidades
Formacion Continua

Actualización covid 19

25 marzo 2020

Actualización del Coronavirus - Miércoles, 25 de marzo de 2020

La evolución de la propagación del Coronavirus sigue siendo motivo de preocupación para las autoridades a escala global. En vista de la evolución de la situación del coronavirus, los responsables políticos necesitan urgentemente pruebas fiables para controlar este nuevo flagelo. Por consiguiente, en su página web, la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) presenta información y asesoramiento sobre el actual brote de coronavirus 2019 con la ayuda de la Biblioteca Cochrane, cuyo objetivo es reunir pruebas científicamente validadas de manera accesible y resumida.
Special Collection: Coronavirus (COVID-19): Infection control and prevention measures
Country & Technical Guidance - Coronavirus disease (COVID-19)

Sin embargo, algunos países, como Singapur, han tomado la decisión de establecer fuertes medidas de vigilancia y contención para frenar la propagación del brote. Además, para combatir la pandemia de coronavirus, COVID-19, la Fundación Jack Ma y la Fundación Alibaba han establecido conjuntamente el programa Global MediXchange for Combating COVID-19 (GMCC) para facilitar la comunicación y la colaboración en línea en todo el mundo, a fin de proporcionar a los equipos médicos de primera línea de todo el mundo los canales de comunicación necesarios para compartir su experiencia práctica en la lucha contra la pandemia.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Surveillance and Containment Measures for the First 100 Patients with COVID-19 in Singapore - January 2-February 29, 2020

Así, para superar el período de confinamiento, los líderes religiosos se encargan de acompañar a la población en este momento en que el temor y el estrés forma cada vez más parte de la vida cotidiana.
The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence

Tambien, a continuación encontrará una selección de recursos interesantes:



Coronavirus (COVID-19) : Soins intensifs / Critical Care / Cuidado Intensivo

OSCE Communiqué

COVID-19: Governments must promote and protect access to and free flow of information during pandemic, say international media freedom experts

GENEVA / WASHINGTON / VIENNA, 19 March 2020 – In light of the growing disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the monitors for freedom of expression and freedom of the media for the United Nations, the Inter-American Commission for Human Rights, and the Representative on Freedom of the Media of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe issued the following joint statement:

“We share the grave concern of people everywhere in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. At a moment of such gravity, we fully understand and support the efforts of public health professionals and governments to develop and implement strategies to protect human health and human life. The fundamental and non-derogable right to life is at stake, and governments are obligated to ensure its protection.

“Human health depends not only on readily accessible health care. It also depends on access to accurate information about the nature of the threats and the means to protect oneself, one’s family, and one’s community. The right to freedom of expression, which includes the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, through any media, applies to everyone, everywhere, and may only be subject to narrow restrictions. In this connection, we urge the following:

“First, it is essential that governments provide truthful information about the nature of the threat posed by the coronavirus. Governments everywhere are obligated under human rights law to provide reliable information in accessible formats to all, with particular focus on ensuring access to information by those with limited internet access or where disability makes access challenging.

“Second, internet access is critical at a time of crisis. It is essential that governments refrain from blocking internet access; in those situations where internet has been blocked, governments should, as a matter of priority, ensure immediate access to the fastest and broadest possible internet service. Especially at a time of emergency, when access to information is of critical importance, broad restrictions on access to the internet cannot be justified on public order or national security grounds.

“Third, the right of access to information means that governments must be making exceptional efforts to protect the work of journalists. Journalism serves a crucial function at a moment of public health emergency, particularly when it aims to inform the public of critical information and monitors government actions. We urge all governments to robustly implement their freedom of information laws to ensure that all individuals, especially journalists, have access to information.

“Fourth, we share the concern that false information about the pandemic could lead to health concerns, panic and disorder. In this connection, it is essential that governments and internet companies address disinformation in the first instance by themselves providing reliable information. That may come in the form of robust public messaging, support for public service announcements, and emergency support for public broadcasting and local journalism (for instance, through government health advertisements).

Resorting to other measures, such as content take-downs and censorship, may result in limiting access to important information for public health and should only be undertaken where they meet the standards of necessity and proportionality. Any attempts to criminalise information relating to the pandemic may create distrust in institutional information, delay access to reliable information and have a chilling effect on freedom of expression.

“Fifth, we are aware of growing use of tools of surveillance technology to track the spread of the coronavirus. While we understand and support the need for active efforts to confront the pandemic, it is also crucial that such tools be limited in use, both in terms of purpose and time, and that individual rights to privacy, non-discrimination, the protection of journalistic sources and other freedoms be rigorously protected. States must also protect the personal information of patients. We strongly urge that any use of such technology abide by the strictest protections and only be available according to domestic law that is consistent with international human rights standards.

“We close by thanking all the medical and health care professionals putting themselves at the frontline of treating the unwell.”

* The experts: David Kaye, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression; Harlem Désir, OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media and Edison Lanza, IACHR Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression

Geneva Centre for Security Policy